KWR researcher @MarthedeGraaff's second report from 12th IWA International Congress on Anaerobic Digestion

101107_foto_weblog_2_uit_mexic
Day 2 started with a plenary session by Professor Foresti (University of Sao Paulo, Brazil), who gave an overview of anaerobic digestion (AD) in Latin America. UASB reactors have been applied widely for treatment of wastewater. Little effort is being done for recovery of P, N or S; the focus of the research in Latin America is more on energy and biohydrogen production. Some research is focusing on nitrogen removal by using electron donors such as methane and sulfur compounds, or applying anammox. As widely known, anaerobic digestion does not remove nutrients, so if they have to be removed, a post treatment step always is necessary.

During the second day I attended several presentations, switching between sessions. Subjects varied from AD of household garbage in Europe to the importance of trace metals during AD. There were a few presentations about micro-aerobic treatment, combining methane production with oxidation at very low oxygen concentrations, such that the methanogenesis is not inhibited. This improves the effluent quality because COD concentrations are lower and sulfide is oxidized improving the biogas quality. This is being
researched in Czech Republic by Pavel Jenicek. Another interesting presentation was by professor Willy Verstraete about the AD of microalgae. As always, his presentation was very inspiring. Advantage of using microalgae is that there is no competition for food. However, costs are high and only at optimal conditions it can be compatible with respect to costs. Best biofuel is biogas according to Verstraete, so there is no need to produce other biofuels from the algae; that is too complex.

Day 2 ended with workshops. I attended the workshop about nutrient recovery by professor Jules van Lier. This was very interesting and gave me some new input for the Exploratory team of WERF. There are still so many challenges for the recovery of nutrients and other resources.
Day 3 started with a plenary session by professor Herbert Fang, University of Hong Kong, presenting an overview of AD in East Asia. In Japan night soil used to be treated by AD, but now aerobic treatment followed membrane separation is the core technology. In China central government is sponsoring biogas projects; resulting in more than 40 million projects. These are mostly in small households with about 20-30 pigs and the biogas is used for cooking. Prefab digesters are for sale.

Day 3 ended with a ‘technical’ tour to a Tequila factory, Herradura, in the town of Tequila. It was impressive to see such a large factory in the middle of Mexico. The wastewater is treated in a digester and the biogas produced is covering the energy demand of the factory. Mexicans are really good in organizing parties; we had diner at the Tequila factory and there was no shortage of Tequila.
The last day started with my presentation (see conclusions below). Fortunately I did not have to present first, because it took some time before the rooms were full… My presentation went well and I received quite some positive reactions afterwards. Other presentations I attended were about anaerobic MBR and solving the fouling problem. An interesting presentation was by Marta Carballa (Spain). She explained that AD of kitchen waste is not so straight forward. She showed results of several pretreatments to improve the hydrolysis.

The congress ended with a plenary session by professor Bruce Rittman, Arizona State University. He is famous for his research in Microbial Electrochemical Cells (MXCs). Although AD is at the moment more feasible, he believes that MXCs have more advantages, e.g. producing hydrogen. But his main message, and I agree with him, is that we should make use of the BOD in anaerobic processes and not oxidize as is currently being done in many wastewater treatments. His group is also researching the pre-treatment technologies for sludge to make it more readily bioavailable. He showed results of the OpenCel process, developed at his group, which uses pulsed electrical fields of high voltage to open flocs and cells. Last subject was about photosynthetic microorganisms; they can help us to produce biomass so that we can produce energy out of it.
In the closing ceremony the winner of the Leaf award was presented. This year it was the group of Jurg Keller, AMWC, UQ, Australia. They showed that you could use the MXCs not in competition with methanogenesis, but to upgrade the biogas by producing NaOH in the MXCs.

Marthe de Graaff

Click here to download:
101107 slide_blog_AD12_MS_de_Graaff[1].ppt (975 KB)

KWR researcher @MarthedeGraaff reports from 12th IWA Internal Congress on Anaerobic Digestion in Mexico

Prof_mccarthy_marthe_de_graaff_weblog_iwa_mexico_klein

For me the IWA Specialist Conference on Anaerobic Digestion started on Sunday morning with suddenly meeting familiar faces in the elevator down to the breakfast room. I even met David de Haas from GHD Australia, who was my supervisor when I did my internship in 2004! We had breakfast together and I hope to talk to him more about greenhouse gas emissions, which was also the topic of my internship and we are both still working on it.

 

Day 1 of the congress started with a plenary session by Professor Perry L. McCarty (see picture above). His lecture started with an historical overview of anaerobic digestion, of course referring to the work of Professor Lettinga. Anaerobic digestion and UASB reactors became successful in the treatment of industrial wastewater. Lately the focus is also on municipal wastewater as this is a big source of methane emissions. Question nowadays is: Can we meet the same effluent standards with anaerobic treatment instead of aerobic treatment? To his opinion, we can. He proposed an overall treatment concept for sewage by separation of suspended solids and liquid COD applying anaerobic digestion for the solids and a secondary anaerobic treatment for the liquid COD. At his current position as professor at Inha University Korea his team is researching several types of reactors, including a fluidized bed anaerobic MBR.  One problem of treating diluted municipal wastewater is that a significant part of the methane is dissolved in the liquid. To his opinion, a methane stripper can be applied to recover the methane.

 

Biogas recovery

Then there were three more sessions in which several issues on anaerobic digestion were discussed. Several researchers showed nice COD mass balances showing that depending on temperature and wastewater up to 85% of the methane can be lost in the effluent. Joanna Cookney form Cranfield University showed that methane can be recovered from the liquid by using poly-di-methyl-siloxane (PDMS) membrane contactors. She proposed to use the PDMS membrane after the anaerobic treatment to increase the biogas recovery.

 

Full scale DeSaR plants

The second session, after lunch, started with a presentation of Grietje Zeeman and she showed the full scale results of the DeSaR concept. It was really nice to see that more and more pilots and full scale DeSaR plants are being realized; for example one in a school in Ukraine. Other presentations in that session were about the Upthane reactor (UASB version of Biothane), fluidized bed reactors for anaerobic wastewater treatment in the sugar industry. One thing that got my attention was the fact that some presenters, like Jeroen van der Lubbe (Biothane), said that high sulfate concentrations are a problem for anaerobic treatment. Whereas my colleague Tessa van den Brand uses the high sulfate concentrations to remove COD. I have to talk to Tessa; probably different approaches and different goals can explain this confusing statements.

 

UBOX

I went to another session to hear the presentation of Peter Yspeert from Paques about the UBOX process. Surprisingly in full scale anaerobic processes the methane is just flared or emitted into the atmosphere. Biogas utilization is not so easy in practice and a lot depends on scale and infrastructure.

 

Remove H2S from biogas

The topic of the last session of the first day was ‘Gas Production and Utilization’, including presentations from Paques about the Thiopaq process for sulfur recovery and from Israel Diaz who applies microaerobic conditions to oxidize the sulfur while at the same time producing biogas. The session ended with a discussion which process would be better to remove H2S from the biogas; it will probably depend on the required biogas quality and costs (one versus two reactors - Thiopaq).

 

In the next days I hope to hear more about several issues of anaerobic digestion and very important, mentioned several times in the opening session, tequila! On Wednesday afternoon there will be a technical tour to a Tequila factory… and then on Thursday morning I will give my presentation.

 

Marthe de Graaff

Klein_graaff_marthe_de